Secondary analysis research services involve using existing data sources to answer new research questions or re-examine previous research findings.
Our comprehensive secondary analysis research services have assisted businesses in overcoming data gaps & limitations and potential biases.
We assist various industries with accurate, Secondary Analysis Research services.
Analyze previously collected data from electronic health records (EHR), national health surveys, and administrative data to study and examine healthcare outcomes.
Perform secondary analysis on consumer data, market trends, advertising campaigns, and other data sets to unearth hidden insights on customer mindset.
Use existing data from national surveys, research studies, and administrative data to answer new questions about socio-economic status, socio-demographic characteristics, etc.
Spot new changes in land use, climate patterns, and wildlife & plant distribution from the data collected from satellite imagery and remote sensing.
Unearth hidden patterns and trends using macroeconomic data, such as GDP, inflation, etc., to study the impact of economic policies on the population.
Use available datasets on election results, public opinion surveys, and political attitudes & behaviors to perform secondary analysis to answer new questions.
Perform secondary analysis on data sets such as standardized tests, student surveys, and teacher evaluations to study the impact of educational policies.
Easy access to old structured and semi-structured data sets.
Get faster decision-making insights using readily available data.
Increased sample size leading to an improved understanding of business.
Get new business insights from previous data.
Reduction in risks due to an increase in business insights.
Comprehensive analysis using an array of alternative data sources.
Discover critical insights at lesser costs and in a quick time.
Get access to a team of data analysts with experience in secondary research analysis across disciplines like statistics, data science, social sciences, and other fields.
We guarantee quality outputs as our experts examine old data with new hypotheses and apply advanced analytical methods to identify patterns.
We bank on various tapped sources (including the internet, government reports, etc.) to gather and assess data for secondary research analysis.
We collect, organize, and analyze secondary data from past datasets with advanced tools and techniques to help you save on time and costs.
We generate data insights from used datasets with speed needed to give you the early mover advantage.
We have been bridging data gaps, maintaining objectivity, and assisting leading industries with data-driven insights. Some of the industries we serve are:
Banking and financial services
Four Pillars of Data Governance shape excellence in data quality & decision-making. Know about their core principles in this guide.
Challenges in data migration testing affect an organization's data integrity & business operations. Uncover some of the key challenges here.
The strength of secondary analysis lies in its ability to build upon existing data and knowledge to address new research questions, making it a cost-effective and efficient approach to generating new insights. Secondary analysis allows researchers to utilize data collected for a different purpose, avoiding the need for additional time, resources, and effort to collect new data. It also provides access to large datasets, enables comparison of results across studies, and can increase the generalizability of findings.
The level of evidence for secondary analysis can vary depending on the quality and rigor of the original study and the methodology used in the secondary analysis. Generally, secondary analysis of well-designed and conducted primary studies can provide moderate to high-level evidence. In contrast, secondary analysis of poorly designed or executed primary studies can result in low-level evidence.
It's important to note that various factors, including the size and diversity of the sample, the strength of the statistical analysis, the potential for confounding and bias, and the data quality, can influence the level of evidence for secondary analysis. The interpretation and generalizability of the findings from a secondary analysis should be made with caution and in consideration of the limitations and strengths of the original study and the secondary analysis.
Secondary research is often considered better for several reasons:
However, secondary research may have limitations, such as outdated information and lack of specificity, so it's important to carefully evaluate the data before using it.
Secondary analysis can be either qualitative or quantitative, depending on the nature of the data that is being analyzed. Secondary analysis refers to re-examining existing data collected for a different purpose or by another researcher.
Quantitative secondary analysis involves analyzing numerical data, such as survey responses or demographic statistics, to draw conclusions and make generalizations about a population.
On the other hand, qualitative secondary analysis involves re-examining qualitative data, such as interview transcripts or field notes, to gain new insights and understanding about a particular phenomenon.
In both cases, secondary analysis can provide valuable insights and save time and resources compared to conducting a new study from scratch. However, it is essential to evaluate the quality and relevance of the existing data before conducting a secondary analysis.
The best approach for secondary research depends on the specific research question and the available data type.
A quantitative approach would be more appropriate if the research question requires a quantitative analysis of numerical data, such as market size or consumer behavior. This might involve analyzing data from surveys, census reports, or market research reports.
A qualitative approach would be more appropriate if the research question requires a more in-depth understanding of people's attitudes, beliefs, or experiences. This might involve analyzing data from qualitative sources such as focus group transcripts, interviews, or open-ended survey responses.
Regardless of the approach, it's important to carefully evaluate the quality and relevance of the existing data and to consider potential limitations and biases that may impact the validity of the results. Additionally, it may be useful to triangulate multiple sources of secondary data to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.
The reliability of secondary analysis depends on several factors, including the quality of the original data, the methods used for the secondary analysis, and the skill and expertise of the researcher conducting the analysis. When the secondary analysis is conducted rigorously, with appropriate methods and attention to limitations and potential sources of bias, it can generate new insights and advance knowledge. However, the results may be unreliable or inaccurate if the original data are of poor quality or if the secondary analysis is conducted poorly.
Working with the Phygital data engineering team has been a game-changer for our company. They helped us identify our data ingestion problems and implemented a centralized system to tackle them. We highly recommend their services.
Technical Product Manager
We needed support to help grow our retail business with data-driven recommendations. We found it in Phygital Insights’ Data Analytics Services. They studied our data, uncovered hidden patterns, and enabled us to anchor decisions on data-driven insights. Don’t look beyond Phygital for all your data needs.
Product Manager, US-based Retail Firm
We were struggling to increase our combined yield for all processes. After several futile efforts, we turned to Phygital. Their end-to-end analysis helped us identify hidden bottlenecks in the production line. We plugged them in to cut down on wastage and improve overall efficiency. Their service was indeed a game-changer.
Senior Operations Manager, US-based Manufacturing Company